Opinion
No. 75608
06-15-2018
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a corporations action. Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991); see NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (stating that this court only rarely considers writ petitions denying motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment). In particular, petitioner may raise the issues identified in the writ petition in any appeal from an adverse final order. Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008) (stating that an appeal is generally an adequate and speedy legal remedy precluding writ relief). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Hardesty cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, Chief Judge
Dechert LLP/New York
Holland & Hart LLP/Las Vegas
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter, & Hamilton LLP
Dechert LLP/San Francisco
Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas
Saxena White PA
Robbing Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP
O'Mara Law Firm, P.C.
Albright Stoddard Warnick & Albright
Eighth District Court Clerk