From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vraiment Hospitality, LLC v. Binkowski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Apr 27, 2012
Case No. 8:11-cv-1240-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 8:11-cv-1240-T-33TGW

04-27-2012

VRAIMENT HOSPITALITY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TODD BINKOWSKI, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court pursuant to the March 19, 2012, report and recommendation of Thomas G. Wilson, United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 61), in which Judge Wilson recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 2) be denied. Judge Wilson conducted a hearing on the motion on December 28, 2011 (Doc. # 39). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation on April 9, 2012. (Doc. # 64). Defendant filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff's objections on April 23, 2012. (Doc. # 65).

After careful consideration and being fully advised in the premises, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and overrules the filed objections. Discussion

A district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

Upon due consideration of the entire record, including the Report and Recommendation, the objections and the response, the Court overrules the objections, adopts the Report and Recommendation and denies the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court agrees with Judge Wilson's detailed and well-reasoned findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Report and Recommendation thoughtfully addresses the issues presented during the motion hearing, and the objections do not provide a basis for rejecting the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation of Thomas G. Wilson, United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 61) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.
(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 2) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 27th day of April, 2012.

____________________________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Vraiment Hospitality, LLC v. Binkowski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Apr 27, 2012
Case No. 8:11-cv-1240-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Vraiment Hospitality, LLC v. Binkowski

Case Details

Full title:VRAIMENT HOSPITALITY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TODD BINKOWSKI, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

Case No. 8:11-cv-1240-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hui Kun LI v. Shuman

Cf. Vraiment Hosp., LLC v. Binkowski, No. 8:11-CV-1240-T-33TGW, 2012 WL 1493737, at **13-14 (M.D. Fla. Mar.…