From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Von Hagen v. Puntervold

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 8, 1972
258 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1243.

February 15, 1972. Rehearing Denied March 8, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Grady L. Crawford, J.

Reiseman, Friedman Buchbinder, Miami, for appellant.

Wilson, Burns Browd, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.


This interlocutory appeal is from an order of the circuit court which granted a motion staying proceedings in the Civil Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida. This procedure is governed by R.C.P. 1.610(e), 31 F.S.A. The circuit court failed to follow the rule and therefore the order staying proceedings must be reversed. The cause is remanded with directions to enter an order dissolving the injunction or requiring the plaintiff in the circuit court to comply with the rule by posting a bond in the amount fixed by the court and otherwise complying with the rule by the payment of costs. See Webb v. Gregory, Fla.App. 1968, 105 So.2d 183; Belk's Department Store, Miami, Inc. v. Scherman, Fla.App. 1960, 117 So.2d 845.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Von Hagen v. Puntervold

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 8, 1972
258 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Von Hagen v. Puntervold

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES VON HAGEN, APPELLANT, v. ADOLF PUNTERVOLD AND THOMINE PUNTERVOLD…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 8, 1972

Citations

258 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

McGovern v. Amira

The evidence manifestly shows that appellants will incur risks and danger of loss depending on the ultimate…