From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Von Bock v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying the defendant's motion and substituting therefor a provision granting the motion to the extent of requiring the plaintiffs to provide an additional undertaking in the amount of $4,500; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; the plaintiffs' time to serve and file the additional undertaking is extended until 10 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order with notice of entry.

The $500 undertaking was inadequate to protect the defendant's interest during the pendency of this action ( see generally, Middle Vil. Assocs. v Vertical Indus. Park Assocs., 176 A.D.2d 708, 710; Weitzen v 130 E. 65th St. Sponsor Corp., 86 A.D.2d 511). Under the circumstances of this case, we grant the defendant's motion to the extent of increasing the undertaking by $4,500 to the sum of $5,000. Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Von Bock v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Von Bock v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHARON VON BOCK et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 940

Citing Cases

Hume v. 1 Prospect Park ALF, LLC

Here, the plaintiff met her burden of establishing conduct which satisfies the requirements of CPLR 6201(3)…