Vogt v. Crow Wing Cnty.

Full title: Molly Vogt, Plaintiff, v. Crow Wing County et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jan 4, 2022

21-cv-1055 (WMW/TNL) (D. Minn. Jan. 4, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-1055 (WMW/TNL)

01-04-2022

Molly Vogt, Plaintiff, v. Crow Wing County et al., Defendants.

WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is the November 1, 2021 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of then-United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Dkt. 32.) No. objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The November 1, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 32), is ADOPTED.

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 15), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

a. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts II-V;

b. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to all counts against Defendants Heath Fosteson, Cherokee DeLeon, Christine Ghinter, and Lukasz Organista; and

1

c. Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Count I against Defendants Robert Anderson, Raynor Blum, and Ronald J. Imgrund.

2