From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vogt v. Churchill

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jan 7, 1997
687 A.2d 961 (Me. 1997)

Summary

affirming trial court's finding that defendants "were entitled to an absolute privilege for statements made in the course of a judicial proceeding, and a conditional privilege which was not abused for statements made outside the judicial proceeding"

Summary of this case from Morgan Art Found. Ltd. v. McKenzie

Opinion

Submitted on briefs December 20, 1996.

Decided January 7, 1997.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Lincoln County, Brodrick, J.

James W. Vogt, pro se.

David L. Herzer, Jr., Mark G. Lavoie, Norman, Hanson DeTroy, Portland, Thomas R. McKeon, Richardson, Whitman, Large Badger, Portland, for Defendants.

Before ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, RUDMAN, DANA and LIPEZ, JJ.


[¶ 1] James Vogt appeals from the decision of the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Brodrick, J.) denying his motion for joinder of claims, and from the entry of a summary judgment ( Fitzsche, J.) in favor of his ex-wife, Nancy Churchill, and her attorney, Elizabeth Scheffee, after he sued them for defamation. The trial court did not err in finding that the defendants were entitled to an absolute privilege for statements made in the course of a judicial proceeding, Dineen v. Daughan, 381 A.2d 663, 664-65 (Me. 1978), and a conditional privilege which was not abused for statements made outside the judicial proceeding, Rippett v. Bemis, 672 A.2d 82, 87 (Me. 1996). Further, the court did not abuse its discretion in treating Vogt's motion for a joinder of claims as a motion to amend his complaint and denying the motion as untimely. Smith v. S.A.D. No. 58, 582 A.2d 247, 249 (Me. 1990).

[¶ 2] Because Vogt's appeal is frivolous or instituted primarily for the purpose of delay, we impose sanctions pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 76(f). We order Vogt to pay treble costs to both Churchill and Scheffee, and we further order him to pay each party $1000 towards their attorney fees.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed. James Vogt ordered to pay treble costs and attorney fees of $1000 to each defendant.

WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Vogt v. Churchill

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jan 7, 1997
687 A.2d 961 (Me. 1997)

affirming trial court's finding that defendants "were entitled to an absolute privilege for statements made in the course of a judicial proceeding, and a conditional privilege which was not abused for statements made outside the judicial proceeding"

Summary of this case from Morgan Art Found. Ltd. v. McKenzie

stating that parties possess an absolute privilege with respect to statements made in the course of a judicial proceeding

Summary of this case from Davis v. Currier
Case details for

Vogt v. Churchill

Case Details

Full title:James VOGT v. Nancy CHURCHILL, et al

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Jan 7, 1997

Citations

687 A.2d 961 (Me. 1997)
1997 Me. 5

Citing Cases

Raymond v. Lyden

[¶ 7] Given that the only source of slander alleged by the Lydens is the complaint instituting this action,…

Davis v. Currier

We are not prepared to recognize that the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress is available…