From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vitullo v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-31-2017

Anita A. VITULLO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant–Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.).

Wilkofsky, Friedman, Karel & Cummins, New York City (Harry A. Cummins of Counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. Rupp Baase Pfalzgraf Cunningham LLC, Buffalo (Marco Cercone of Counsel), for defendant-respondent.


Wilkofsky, Friedman, Karel & Cummins, New York City (Harry A. Cummins of Counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Rupp Baase Pfalzgraf Cunningham LLC, Buffalo (Marco Cercone of Counsel), for defendant-respondent.

Same memorandum as in Vitullo v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (Appeal No. 1), 148 A.D.3d 1773, ––– N.Y.S.3d –––– (2017).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, DeJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vitullo v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Vitullo v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Anita A. VITULLO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 31, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
148 A.D.3d 1775