Opinion
April 4, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.).
The motion was properly denied insofar as based on CPLR 510 (1) since defendant's principal place of business is located in Bronx County (CPLR 503 [c]), and also insofar as based on CPLR 510 (3) since defendant failed to identify the witnesses who would be inconvenienced by having to travel to Bronx County and the nature of their testimony (Clark v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr., 170 A.D.2d 271).
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Tom, JJ.