From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vitiello v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 2000
270 A.D.2d 253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued December 7, 1999

March 9, 2000

In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendant Action Redi-Mix Corp. from operating a concrete manufacturing/batching plant on certain premises in the defendant City of Yonkers, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered March 10, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the cause of action for a permanent injunction.

James G. Sweeney, P.C., Goshen, N.Y., for appellants.

Bleakley Platt Schmidt, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Matthew G. Parisi of counsel), for respondent Action Redi-Mix Corp.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Action Redi-Mix Corp. (hereinafter Action Redi-Mix) operates a concrete manufacturing or batching plant. The plant was built pursuant to a valid building permit, issued after Action Redi-Mix obtained a change of the property's zoning designation. However, the plant's conformity with the zoning code came into question when the zoning designation change was nullified, and the plant reverted to its former zoning designation. The plaintiffs, who are residents of a nearby cooperative apartment building, commenced this action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the operation of the plant. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on that cause of action. We affirm. Questions of fact exist as to whether the plaintiffs have suffered special damages, and whether the plant is in violation of the relevant zoning code provisions (see,Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of N. Hempstead, 69 N.Y.2d 406 ; Little Joseph Realty v. Town of Babylon, 41 N.Y.2d 738 ; Williams v. Hertzwig, 251 A.D.2d 655 ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants' motion for summary judgment.

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, SCHMIDT, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vitiello v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 2000
270 A.D.2d 253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Vitiello v. City of Yonkers

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE VITIELLO, et al., appellants, v. CITY OF YONKERS, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 119

Citing Cases

Ram Island Homeowners Ass'n v. Hathaway Realty

Thus, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action. The Supreme…

In re Action Redi-Mix Corp. v. Davison

A municipality may not impose its zoning regulations upon lands outside its territorial limits (see, Matter…