From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vitarelle v. Richard Vitarelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-01844.

September 8, 2009.

In an action to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the plaintiff Richard T Vitarelle, Sr., appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.), dated December 5, 2006, as, on consent, awarded possession of the subject premises to the defendant.

Greshin, Ziegler Amicizia, LLP, Smithtown, N.Y. (Matthew H. Bligh of counsel), for appellant.

Siben Siben, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Michael P. DeNoto of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Covello and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff consented to the portion of the judgment appealed from which awarded possession of the subject premises to the defendant. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed, as no appeallies from a judgment entered upon the consent of the appealing party ( see CPLR 5511; Matter of Shteierman v Shteierman, 29 AD3d 810; Ryan Mgt. Corp. v Cataffo, 278 AD2d 217, 218).


Summaries of

Vitarelle v. Richard Vitarelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Vitarelle v. Richard Vitarelle

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE-MARIE L. VITARELLE, Appellant, v. RICHARD VITARELLE, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 8, 2009

Citations

65 A.D.3d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6423
885 N.Y.S.2d 320

Citing Cases

Fassler v. Fassler

On such a motion, the Court's sole inquiry is whether the facts alleged in the complaint fit within any…

Dooley v. Dooley

Here, a review of the complaint reveals that the plaintiff has plead cognizable causes of action for a…