From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Violette v. Pharos House

United States District Court, D. Maine
Sep 10, 2021
CIVIL 2:21-cv-148-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 10, 2021)

Summary

assessing an alleged Fourth Amendment violation

Summary of this case from Freeman v. Pullen

Opinion

CIVIL 2:21-cv-148-DBH

09-10-2021

GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE, Plaintiff v. PHAROS HOUSE, et al., Defendants


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 23, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision After Review of Plaintiff's Complaint. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on September 7, 2021. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore Ordered that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby Adopted. The plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Violette v. Pharos House

United States District Court, D. Maine
Sep 10, 2021
CIVIL 2:21-cv-148-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 10, 2021)

assessing an alleged Fourth Amendment violation

Summary of this case from Freeman v. Pullen
Case details for

Violette v. Pharos House

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE, Plaintiff v. PHAROS HOUSE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

CIVIL 2:21-cv-148-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 10, 2021)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. Pullen

None of these cases has precedential value, and none involves the liberty interest inquiry. See United States…