From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Servs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 13, 2024
23 Civ. 5138 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 13, 2024)

Opinion

23 Civ. 5138 (LGS) 23 Civ. 5409 (LGS)

05-13-2024

VINCI BRANDS LLC, Plaintiff, v. COACH SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. KATE SPADE LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VINCI BRANDS LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on May 9, 2024, attorneys from the law firm Debevoise & Plimpton LLP appeared on behalf of Case-Mate, Inc. (“Case-Mate”), a party in three related litigations -- the above-captioned actions and the related action Coach IP Holdings, LLC v. ACS Group Acquisition LLC, No. 23 Civ. 10612 (LGS);

WHEREAS, all three actions include claims against Case-Mate relating to Case-Mate's replacement of Vinci Brands LLC as licensee for certain Coach and Kate Spade products, respectively. All three actions involve substantially similar parties and legal issues;

WHEREAS, extensive litigation has occurred in both actions. There are now 365 docket entries in Case No. 23 Civ. 5138 and 267 docket entries in Case No. 23 Civ. 5409. Fact discovery currently is scheduled to close in less than a month on June 6, 2024;

WHEREAS, 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) directs a judge to disqualify herself “in any proceeding in which [her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” See also Canon 3C(1) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.

WHEREAS, the continued appearance of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP in these actions would require the recusal of this Court, “a circumstance that was or should have been known to that firm at the time of its retention.” See In re F.C.C., 208 F.3d 137, 138 (2d Cir. 2000); accord United States v. Navarro, No. S6 20 Crim. 160, 2021 WL 1948346, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2021). It is hereby

ORDERED that the firm of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP shall withdraw its appearance in these matters. See In re F.C.C., 208 F.3d at 139-40 (“As between a judge already assigned to a panel, and a lawyer who thereafter appears in circumstances where the appearance might cause an assigned judge to be recused, the lawyer will go and the judge will stay.”); accord United States v. Khan, 538 F.Supp.2d 937, 938 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (“binding Second Circuit precedent” directed withdrawal of attorney on judge's conflict list).

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to strike the appearances of the individual attorneys at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP as counsel of record for Case-Mate.


Summaries of

Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Servs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 13, 2024
23 Civ. 5138 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Servs.

Case Details

Full title:VINCI BRANDS LLC, Plaintiff, v. COACH SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 13, 2024

Citations

23 Civ. 5138 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 13, 2024)