From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vincent-Wilday, Inc. v. Strait

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 12, 1948
273 App. Div. 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

May 12, 1948.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.


Order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and motion denied, without costs, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: Defendant may appeal from the order herein. ( Cullen v. Uptegrove, 101 App. Div. 147; O'Reilly v. New York Central R.R. Co., 240 App. Div. 1009.) The defendant was competent to testify as to his past and present condition and as to his ability to work without being caused pain. His testimony thereon was uncontradicted. The reasons assigned by the County Judge for granting the motion were not justified on the evidence. All concur. (The order grants plaintiff's motion for a new trial unless defendant stipulates to reduce the verdict in favor of him on his counterclaim, in an automobile negligence action.)


Summaries of

Vincent-Wilday, Inc. v. Strait

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 12, 1948
273 App. Div. 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Vincent-Wilday, Inc. v. Strait

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT-WILDAY, INC., Respondent, v. RAYMOND W. STRAIT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 12, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Stevenson v. State

The medical records in evidence also do not support a finding of significant pain or limitations right after…

Dennis v. Prisock

Physical pain, weakness, exhaustion and the like are matters one may testify about. Whiddon v. Malone, 220…