From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vinbill Corp. v. Morrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1963
19 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

June 24, 1963


In two actions to recover the balance allegedly due for goods sold and delivered, brought separately by the same plaintiff against each of two corporations having a common principal officer and stockholder, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated June 14, 1962, which denied its motion to consolidate such actions for joint trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion for consolidation granted. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny consolidation of these actions for trial. So far as appears from the record, both actions involve related transactions; the issues and the witnesses will be the same in both; and we see no material prejudice to the defendants resulting from consolidation. Ughetta, Acting P.J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vinbill Corp. v. Morrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1963
19 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Vinbill Corp. v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:VINBILL CORP., Appellant, v. EDWARD T. MORRISON, Defendant, and MOLLY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Cornell v. Reed

In Action No. 2, pending in the County Court, Dutchess County, respondents Reed Reed made claim for other…

Chinatown Apts. v. N.Y. City Transit Auth

Neither the city nor Chinatown satisfactorily demonstrates that consolidation will result in prejudice to a…