From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vilma C. v. (In re Giannis F.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 8, 2015
134 A.D.3d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

12-08-2015

In re GIANNIS F., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc.,Vilma C., Respondent–Appellant,Manny M., Respondent,The Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent. Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the child.


Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the child.

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Carol R. Sherman, J.), entered on or about March 18, 2014, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about December 18, 2013, which found that respondent mother had neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition. Appeal from decision, same court and Judge, entered on or about December 16, 2013, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding of neglect against the mother (see Family Ct. Act §§ 1012[f][i][B]; 1046[b][i] ). At the fact-finding hearing, the subject child testified that her half brother sexually abused her for nearly four years and that although she alerted her mother on two separate occasions to the abuse, the mother failed to protect her (see Matter of Dayanara V. [Carlos V.], 101 A.D.3d 411, 412, 955 N.Y.S.2d 566 [1st Dept.2012] ). Family Court's credibility determinations are entitled to deference (see Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 777, 381 N.Y.S.2d 865, 345 N.E.2d 337 [1975] ), and they are supported by the record (see Dayanara, 101 A.D.3d at 412, 955 N.Y.S.2d 566).

SWEENY, J.P., ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vilma C. v. (In re Giannis F.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 8, 2015
134 A.D.3d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Vilma C. v. (In re Giannis F.)

Case Details

Full title:In re GIANNIS F., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc.,Vilma C.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 8, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
19 N.Y.S.3d 880
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8951

Citing Cases

Manny M. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Giannis F.)

Were we to consider it, we would find that the record supports the determination that respondent, the subject…

In re Derrick GG.

Family Court also discounted testimony from the seventh child's mental health counselor, who stated that, to…