From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villaneuva v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2706 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2706 LKK EFB P.

October 3, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 16, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 16, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's November 28, 2007, and May 14, 2008, motions for temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions are denied.


Summaries of

Villaneuva v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2706 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Villaneuva v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:JOSE VILLANEUVA, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 3, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2706 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Shores v. Centurion Inc.

"[T]here must be a presently existing threat of harm, although injury need not be certain to occur."…

Pinson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

” Villaneuva v. Sisto, CIV S-06-2706 LKK EFB P, 2008 WL 4467512, at *3 (E.D. Cal. …