From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vigliotti v. Ricci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1996
229 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 1, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the defendants' motions are denied, and the plaintiffs' first and third causes of action are reinstated.

In January 1994, a medical malpractice action was timely commenced against the instant defendants denominating Anthony Vigliotti and his wife Marie Vigliotti as the plaintiffs. The complaint sought damages for the defendants' failure to diagnose and treat Mr. Vigliotti's lung cancer, while Mrs. Vigliotti sought damages for loss of services. However, unbeknownst to the plaintiffs' counsel, Mr. Vigliotti had died prior to the commencement of the action. Accordingly, this action was dismissed on the ground that it had been commenced by a deceased plaintiff.

Thereafter, the administrator of Mr. Vigliotti's estate, along with Mrs. Vigliotti, commenced the instant action within six months after the dismissal, adding a cause of action for wrongful death. The Supreme Court erred in dismissing the first and third causes of action as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Pursuant to CPLR 205 (a), the administrator and Mrs. Vigliotti had a right to commence a new action ( see, Carrick v. Central Gen. Hosp., 51 N.Y.2d 242; George v. Mt. Sinai Hosp., 47 N.Y.2d 170). O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vigliotti v. Ricci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1996
229 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Vigliotti v. Ricci

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY VIGLIOTTI, JR., as Administrator of the Estate of ANTHONY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 564

Citing Cases

Matter of Winston v. Wetlands Bd.

5 (a) was held applicable to proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78. The dissent in Morris protested that…

Landau v. Larossa

., 94 AD2d 688, 62 NY2d 819; Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343; GTFM, LLC v Nagy, 18 AD3d…