From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Viggiani v. Grodotzke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2003
306 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04114

Submitted May 7, 2003.

June 2, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated March 22, 2002, which granted the defendant's unopposed motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Ralph Viggiani, Jr., did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law 5102(d).

Steven Cohn, P.C., Carle Place, N.Y. (Paul D. Dinkelmeyer of counsel), for appellants.

Abamont Associates, Westbury, N.Y. (Nicolini, Paradise, Ferretti Sabella [Barbara Hall] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent.

The plaintiffs did not submit any papers in opposition to the defendant's motion. No appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing parties (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Abraham S., 291 A.D.2d 452; Acierno v. Hotsy Corp., 289 A.D.2d 271).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Viggiani v. Grodotzke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2003
306 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Viggiani v. Grodotzke

Case Details

Full title:RALPH VIGGIANI, JR., ET AL., appellants, v. BRIAN W. GRODOTZKE, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 337

Citing Cases

Durand v. Simmons

The lower court's refusal to consider the papers that petitioner submitted in opposition to respondents'…

Whitwell Realty Corp. v. Fonseca

Appellant did not submit any papers in opposition to respondent's motion giving rise to the February 5, 2016…