Opinion
08 Civ. 7512 (JGK) 01 Cr. 0571 (JGK)
01-30-2014
CHRISTIAN VIERTEL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The Court has received the attached submission, which purports to ask for various documents, including grand jury records, and asks for someone to "show cause" on various issues, including whether "clerk Lopez" was a "living clerk."
The application is denied. There is no pending action before this Court for which such information could be relevant. The last application for a writ of error coram nobis was denied, and the appeal from that Order is pending in the Court of Appeals.
In addition, the petitioner has failed to show good cause for the discovery he seeks and, with respect to any requests for grand jury materials, he has failed to make the particularized showing necessary to obtain such materials. See, e.g., Garafola v. United States, 909 F. Supp. 2d 313, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) ("A petitioner in a habeas corpus proceeding generally does not have a right to discovery unless the petitioner can show good cause." (citation omitted)); Ida v. United States, 191 F. Supp. 2d 426, 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) ("[L]itigants seeking access to grand jury materials must show a particularized need for such materials . . . ." (citation omitted)).
The application for orders to show cause is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: New York, New York
January 30, 2014
__________
John G. Koeltl
United States District Judge
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, FRITZ 6. BLUMENBERG, CHRISTIAN T. VIERTEL, defs JOHN C.LEE, exclusive NoLLee
(faxed to chambers @ 805-7912 on Jan-27-14)
UN[RE]SOLVED MOTION, DA CAPO, FOR ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE, TO APPREHEND A STILL FUGITIVE "SEALED INDICTMENT" LOST, FEIGNED OR FILED ON 6/14/01's ELEVENTH HOUR; TO FURTHERMORE 1) SHOW "JUDICIAL SEALING" ORDER OF 6/14/01; 2)SH0W COURT FORM AO 190; 3) SHOW WHY ID-MARK "JUDGE KOELTL" ON D0C#1 INFIXED 5 DAYS LATER SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED; 4) SHOW PROPRIETY FOR NYSD-CR-CASE-570's 96+ HOURS DOCKET SALTO FORWARD TO 6/18; 5) SHOW "CLERK LOPEZ" WAS A LIVING CLERK "WHO" FOLLOWED JUDICIAL ORDER ON 6/14 OR 6/15 BY RUBBERSTAMPING WARRANTS
The Court was noticed by "GOTCHA" fax http://bit.ly/1f3zQ54 that rectitude of a "06/14/2001" TRUE BILL filing was dismal, as in FRAUD UPON THE COURT.
2001 (Cr) 00571- (03) (JGK)
[published http://bit.ly/1hO0Bwm]
Motion for expedited Orders and for _ of _ due lack of Federal
Jurisdiction for Count One _ noth time-barred _ cats
Pursuant to what this Court SO ORDERED on 01/11/14; "granted in part and denied in part". As in - stratagem cunctatoris - the Court misconstrued its "grant" of a direct Motion demand for SHOW-TELL-RELEASE of a truly "SEALED INDICTMENT" as proclaimed per DOC# 1, which the Court ultimately failed to produce from Courthouse records, despite available services from its intramural "Sealed Records Department".
"In order for a document to be filed under seal, a protective order must be signed or a request by letter must be granted by a judge. A copy of the order or letter must be presented when filing the document. The only exceptions are if the entire action has been placed under seal or a judge has signed the sealing envelope and submits it directly to the sealed records clerk" Federal Dudiciary Center: All documents filed must contain original signatures.
"There is such a thing as due process of law !"
Scalia on 1/21/2614 as reminder to the Federal Judiciary.
Good CAUSE is based upon good law : US V. COTTON (01-687) 535 U.S. 625 (2002): "Because subject-matter jurisdiction involves a court's power to hear a case, it can never be forfeited or waived. Thus, defects require correction regardless of whether the error was raised in district court", and,
Where jurisdiction is challenged it must be proved.
(Hagan vs. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 (1974)); see also: "Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause. Jurisdiction is power to declare the law, and when it ceases to exist, the only function remaining to the court is that of announcing the fact and dismissing the cause." (Exparte McCardle, 7 Wall.506, 514 (1869)). Chief Judge Kozinski slightly touched the tip of one iceberg of a mountain-chain of icebergs: "There is an epidemic of Brady violations abroad in the Land. Only judges can put a stop to it." [U.S. vs. Olsen]. Movant notes that Kozinski obviously refers to the noble majority of the judiciary.
GOOD CAUSE UNO
In lieu, this Court re-produced two, déjà-vue indubitably confederated, probably doctored and concocted rather self-serving and bogus documents (DOC#_1 titled "INDICTMENT" was backdated & DOC#_2, also titled "INDICTMENT" a "saftig fig leave-scam" typed up hastily by USANYS' prosecution team for extra-rubberstamping by any ready and slavish enough Magistrate in commission of entry-fraud) on PACER files to seek derailment of DUE PROCESS review, but unconforming to DOC#314 MOTION DEMAND (hereby adopted in its entirety).
[Hon.Puppitman A-Go-Go ? F avorism catches friendly fire]
How many "INDICTMENT" LABELS is this Court going to pull (?) and mail around, before a missing "SEALED UPON APPLICATION" VERSION will see daylight?
What "Caindence" : Idem typistry, idem Word-Software, idem template - slightly botched, idem paperstock, INDICTMENT over INDICTMENT
Image materials not available for display.
Seasoned Federal Clerks confirmed to Movant, that DOC# 2 was not prepared and not worded by Honorable Pitman or his staff, evidenced by the missing "ORDER" label adjacent right of the caption and by fact that Magistrates "would not type up INDICTMENTS ,pointing to the United States for the overt template blunder", also, staff pointed out, that "no record of a United States "Application" can be Located nor records of what Pitman posits in this clip below (from Doc# 2), clearly CROSSING A RED LINE :
Image materials not available for display.
Meanwhile for purposes of this MOTION, Movant must count (with prudence) upon Hon.Pitman's signed and super-duper-rubberstamped statement:1) "was returned" and 2) "application of the Government" was made 06/14/2061, Movant and Public must bank upon integrity and fear of disrepute that a Magistrate "wouldn't fib in favor of a powerful plaintiff" in violation of his/her sworn duties, unless for a substantial ROI :
ROI= Return Of Investment [on presumption that judicial reputation has a value]
THE COURT MUST ORDER A SEARCH & RESCUE, NOW
Thus this Court shall NOW ORDER AD HOC an intramural Search & Rescue mission for VERIFICATION if DUE PROCESS checks out, or, if all fails and aborts what JUDICIAL REMEDIES would be due, proper and agreeable to the injured parties, including the citizenry at large.
Seriatim: DOC#314 MOTION to SHOW an "allegedly" SEALED INDICTMENT challenged conformity and true record of a factual, not fictitious, judicial sealing on whatever non-doctored date, if at all (whether upon application or by unlawful osmosis), and further challenged: USANYS POSESSORSHIP OF A VALID AND TRUE BILL ON 6/14/01, AND WHETHER SUCH INDICTMENT WAS FILED IN OPEN COURT (wink-wink-it was not, Movant is told), AND SHOW AO190 with Foreman Rehm's own jurat, AND SHOW A DATED, JUDICIAL TO BE SEALED NOW ORDER BY AN IDENTIFIABLE MEMBER OF THE DUDICIARY who was present in Court.
Pursuant to Court/Clerk records and information, Movant recognized, that a duty Magistrate on 2001 U.S. Flag Day was probably not judicially engaged here, simply because lMagistrates ack jurisdiction to accept and bless one, two or three "Proposals for Arrest", unless upon certain valid applications in exclusion of "mirth over a potential Indictment".
Hon. M. Dolinger did actively FILE legitimate Indictments, non-sealed, and issued, genuinely authorized, signed A/Warrants on "U.S.-Flag-day" 6/14/2001 including i.e.01-mj-1113 Beckman/mj-1130 Pazraino/mj-1125 Allen/mj-1119 Bracey/mj-1118 Wilbur/mj-1117 Medina. Blumenberg, Lee and Viertel were not
Still, legally worthless, doctored "ARREST WARRANT" paperwork was left judicially unprocessed, which caused the USANYS since to dematerialize all traces from SONY records.
JUDGE KOELTL's Bench Appearance Hearing on 6/19/01 rolled by sans "Arrest Warrants", in disrespect of a DJ's Operations MANUAL stating that: a Judge must "ascertain, whether (d) a warrant had been issued" (DOC# 3 , points to lack of DUE PROCESS: "unreturned", vanished warrants: "Officer's Return of Arrest Warrant", NO FORM A0442: Receipt and Execution of a Warrant must be certified by an authorized Officer), but more;
Bench Book for District Judges (amend-2000):
GOOD CAUSE DOS
Movant's "own", the third cloned "RUBBER Warrant" was seriously tampered by coloring-artist "AUSA issuer" Mark Harris, affixing an - extra judicial novelty - "Signature-ID-Stamp" of a foreseeably unseeable Clerk in lieu of the physical presence in flesh by a living clerk as DUE PROCESS demands (or maybe not?). Fact is HARRIS was not entitled on 6/14/2001 to a real_Arrest Warrant for lack of a valid true bill.
SELF-DECLARATION by "Mark Harris is a former clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justices John Paul Stevens and Lewis Powell, Jr., and Judge Joel FLaum of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Mark subsequently served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, during which he prosecuted a broad spectrum of federal crimes, including health care fraud, financial fraud, and corporate embezzlement , and tried a number of jury trials and argued before the Second Circuit."(bold/underline added) Added: Talmudic law scholar.
Simple as that.
President Obama pronounced last week at the DOJ that aliens are entitled to equal respect, ex post facto and belated Movant suspects.
Image materials not available for display.
When 5 years are just not lengthy enough
On 66/14/01, AUSA Harris was caught sans TRUE BILL, evidently, a "Magistrate's or delegated Clerk's Warrant" would be elusive while the 18 USC $3282(a) TIMEX tick-tick-ticked on "his crucial §371 prison enhancement ploy". §371, as the Court will recall, was the eleventh-hour COUNT ONE (Viertel - Long proven untenable - overt acts, §371).
Grave situations, common in collapsing schemes, call for gravest improprieties, law-coloring and sophisticated cover-up-means inculpating the families of more than three - presumptively innocent - false arrest-victims. This was not legitimate trustworthy Federal Court Business. In California fabricators are not admitted to the bar.
It certainly was USA White's non-kosher Monkey-type-Business, a near-miss, but not near DUE PROCESS. This government ploy was only now fully discovered - reward-free - thanks to federal whistleblowers at two Courthouses believing in good cause and in INTEREST OF JUSTICE in promotion of DUE PROCESS, sanctions for wrongdoers and claw backs to reputation and triple Benjamin's undeservedly purloined .
Efforts to fix the perpetual misery machine that is our criminal justice system have won support not only from progressives and academics but from conservatives, from enlightened law enforcement groups, from business and even from advocates for crime victims. (Bill Keller NYT 01/26/2014 OP)
FUGITIVES ON THE LOOSE ?
One day later 06/15/2801, Movant hereby continues to certify under 28USC§1746, AUSA Mark Harris confederated with FBI-SQUAD C-12, BQMRA to broadcast a PRIORITY FBI-Cable to (1) Garret Mountain RA New Jersey, (2) Bridgeport RA Connecticut, and (3) Palm Beach RA Florida
in follow up of "Reference telephone calls from SSA O'Sullivan" et al to (Synopsis) "Locate and apprehend CHRISTIAN T.VIERTEL - FUGITIVE (B)" under "3): FBI-SQUAD C-12's interstate faxes deliberately, under false pretense, mischaracterized "Enclosures" in that "a) Copy" had the above fake signature stamp, and "b) Copy" was an seal-free, signature- Foreperson-free, NO-Open-Court DRAFT at http://bit.ly /1d4b1BY [Appendix B] or, by lucky chance or oversight, if plaintiff USA's agents did not yet cleans Court files, all 11+ DRAFT pages should lay in @ DOC# 7 SDFL certified under Rule 40 and not really advisable for tampering.
Ostensibly, not a single of three fake "Arrest/Warrant" were returned , nor lawfully executed to this date, notwithstanding 3 chained non-violent arrestees from "three other federal districts" , understandably so, Movant was advised by Clerks, because any execution "return" of a fake arrest warrant would have etched USA's document fraud in stone unmasking their tools employed for premature, false, preemptive, unconstitutional arrests. Harris, under White/Canellos's control, "swindled" to 5 extra days of undeserved authority to prosecute, inter alia, Viertel's time-barred COUNT ONE, §371.
RA = FBI Resident Agency branch
Snapshot from FBI ORIGINAL
Image materials not available for display.
If tampering did happen, MOVANT received a fresh SET of the TRANSMISSION, Courtesy WPB*SDFL; upon request to nuncprotunclaw@aol.com , with pleasure
Making a materially false statement in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
GOOD CAUSE TRES
This distinguished, impartial COURT shall proper NOTICE the evidence and try its luck in "judicial preponderance", ultimately, as in " relevant conduct " assessments, and gauge how small a probability remained that AUSA Harris possessed a VALID, Foreman-approved, A0190-certified, to be SEALED or not, OPEN-COURT-FILED VALID Indictment on 06/14/2001. Truly set below ZILCH, NAPA as in LOVE .
Equally ZILCH are chances that successful Grand-Dury sandwich-Meister Harris [Supreme Court "groomed", with a well stocked quiver of legal ethics] would disallow his FBI-goons from high-fiving a trophy BILL, if he had caught one .
Harris could not catch the TRUE BILL on time, and Movant certifies herewith, that Harris instructed Palm Beach AUSA Lothrop Morris and AUSA William Zloch ("ben" of a real SDFL Chief Judge) to distract Honorable Ann Vitunac by hyperbole multimillion hearsay from the missing BILL "issue" and from checking 06/14/2001 records onward on uscourt.gov's intranet during Viertel's initial chained Appearance 6/19/2001 in Palm Beach at 9:30am.
A day earlier, 06/18/81, SDFL FBI CRA faxed at 82:55 Harris's unsigned, un-indexed DRAFT-BILL onwards to USAO WPB, at least 4 days after "DOC# 1-FILE-day's [D1] back-entry by Clerk (jm). On 06/19/01 USAO WPB FL at 08:57am refaxed (No.485), the same, now "S-days-aqed" DRAFT-BILL seemingly still the "best they could come up with" to Rogers' Courthouse Magistrate intake laser.
Amazingly, on 06/19/2001, 5 days after "D1-SEAL" FILE-day, the United States of America ignominiousLy dumps on "Domina Justiciar non sequitur, and appears by breakfast time in Vitunac's Court without a REAL INDICTMENT .
"two 9/11 Hijackers held a power breakfast 06/19/2001 nearby on Atlantic Avenue, while SSA Joseph G.Sconzo - 561-296-7900, was busy executing a warrant-less "FUGITIVE" capture of Movant VIERTEL in Boca Raton, FLafter having deceived Boca Police on 06/18 over his possession of a "Federal Warrant" to induce Boca Police to provide "AOA" (assist other agency)to him.
According to MARY 30 WHITE'S A0257 COURT FILING by AUSA Harris and the SSA "6/25/2001 FBI fax author O'Sullivan", the USANYS did certify that Viertel was a) not a FUGITIVE, and b) the USANYS was without a DOCKET NUMBER. See clipart below;
AO 257 redacted scan (undocketed, discovery by Motion)
Image materials not available for display.
GOOD CAUSE CUATRO
Movant certifies that - inter alia - all false arrest warrants copies and the multi-faxed but unsigned DRAFT-BILL, at least 15 pages of FBI RECORDS, were evidently understood to be subject to disappearance - as in evidence destruction and record tampering - without trace from the "official custodian of FBI/D03 records". These 15 pages, in fact, were omitted from requisite content of a 450+ pages FOIA-Appeal ORDER mailed to Affiant, who hereby states that the D03-RECORD was certified as "complete", some portions were redacted. The "Arrest/Warrant" pertaining to VIERTEL's false arrest on 6/19/2001 was missing.
FURTHER ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO ORDER IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OF REMAINING MAY/3UNE 2001 GRAND 3URY RECORDS WHICH MERE SUBJECT
TO GAG-ORDER SECRETED ON MORE THAN LESS IGNOBLE GROUNDS
This fact alone is perfect cause to NOW ORDER THE GRAND JURY RECORDS IMMEDIATELY RELEASED which are UNDER ENHANCED GREAT DANGER OF VANISHMENT, as the tampering incidents above demonstrate. This Court is hereby put on NOTICE that PLAINTIFF MISCONDUCT IS MORE LIKELY THAN NOT,
At the same time of such ORDER, the COURT must enlarge demand for delivery of the Agate Realty INVOICE, which is held by the FBI Laboratory in D.C. under Case ID .N0196D-NY-279333 - 45 as SPECIMEN "Q6" (Note by Confidential Informant : "A digital record of Q1 through Q6 specimens is retained" as of 05/10/2002), This document, stems from BMI's own laser printer, is a clean but fake voucher BMI has every right to make, and the RIGHT not to mail as part of its June Report 1996 but embargo in New York, that was later falsely, if not insanely attributed to Movant as "authored", digitally in virgin FORMAT without subsequent tampering by USANYS' prosecution team during jury deliberations in 2002 when it became "GX501-wink-wink" altered by government pen and ink.
Contrary to false charge of §1341 non-domestic mailing in furtherance of "Burda's Foreign Commerce conduct" not proscribed by Congress in §1341
Movant certifies that this "charged" voucher was introduced as evidence, but not as "interstate matter" during the Dune 2001 Grand Jury proceedings (supra) when it was still "unmolested, without 10 cents extra". USANYS was apparently a deficient custodian at all times.
"Society wins" , the Supreme Court in Brady held (at 87) "not only when the guilty are convicted but when criminal trials are fair , our system of the administration of justice suffers when any accused is treated unfairly."
Qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent
Furthermore, it is highly implausible, Movant submits, that DO] can validly controvert or oppose these instant DEMANDS presented intra, nor can D03 proffer a lawful non-libelous, non-malicious basis for branding Movant VIERTEL as "FUGITIVE" in its own 6/15/2001 FBI facsimile, but it was a planned D03 ruse rogue "enforcers" employ to forestall defective authority, which lack of a real arrest warrant represents. Dirty Tool Boxes must be closed and disclosed to the public to view what is improper administration of justice and what not. Movant submits that this case supports the OPTION for Grand 3urors to use twitter© accounts, those dark alleys of Justice will remain hidden and prison business costlier than ever.
YET MORE GOOD CAUSE TO SHOW CAUSE
[H.6. Wells' Miracle on Pearl Street?]
a judicial ORDER that could be authorizing a sworn SONY CLERK to certify three "Arrest Warrants" on 6/15/2001. The DOJ's nomenclature chose - in expectation of undetectable abuse - DOCUMENT FRAUD
Image materials not available for display.
in RUBBERS TAMPING a fake-signature-ID "_" onto an official Court Form, which, inter alia, violated DUE PROCESS, Civic and Human Rights, and probably as racial-bias. Taken in the popular KLIEG lights " most favorable to the government", the evidence included the following,
Fake labels Rudy Kurniawan was caught to glue onto cheap wines, White, Canellos, Weddle, Harris, Cohen etc. glue onto unwanted truth each day
Fictio juris non est ubi Veritas : link http://bit. ly/1cMDDme
GOOD CAUSE CINQUE
Only conjecture" can support a claim that a "True Bill" was "FILED" and maybe on a slimmest chance also "SEALED upon application" earlier than 6/19/2001, Movant certifies that federal whistleblower provided a "handwritten statement from a D0J-USANYS operative, who stated indubitably on the bottom section of the USA's own Form No. USA-33s-274 (Ed.9-25-58), captioned: US vs . BLUMENBERG, LEE, VIERTEL INDICTMENT 01 Cr._[blank]_ MARY JO WHITE (blank), Foreperson (blank) these pivotal words:
"6/19/01 Filed Indictment. Case assigned to Judge Koeltl
For all purposses [sic]. Signature
(Signature redacted, spelling error in Original)
Since all "purposses" include seeking VACATUR for COUNT ONE (VIERTEL, BOTH OVERT ACTS charged to have occurred before 6/19/1996) for lack of 3URSIDICTION pursuant to 18 USC §3282. Movant submits, that the overt act, beside their absurdity, were simply time barred under the section: "unless the indictment is found... within five years next after such offense shall have been committed." A 6/14/2001 "INDICTMENT" would bring both absurd acts within, 6/19/2001 renders both absurd acts without, and moot.
It has IRONIC dimension that both these time-barred and absurd overt acts were created with the DOJ's malicious prosecution tool, that, more likely than not, this COURT and his law clerks knew to have been used.
Furthermore, several clerks independently confirmed that the practice of "back-dating", switching out already filed documents, generally fudging with the official record is rampant in Federal Courthouses, and certainly more so in the SDNY for three reasons: 1) because "caliber" law firms are in the " gimme " business, 2) USANYS had weighty demands and uncontrollable help,(Yes, Mr Bharara from 2881 on they did!) and 3) Clerk James Parkison failed to protect Clerks from this esgairely onslaught, but he did help muddy iffy tracks.
SUMMARY OF COLLATERAL DEMANDS FOR ORDERS TO:
1) SHOW "JUDICIAL SEALING" ORDER OF 6/14/01 the "Real McCoy", not any "fake O'Sullivan" or "Pitman-fix"
2) SHOW COURT FORM AO 190, DATED & SIGNED BY FOREMAN;
3) SHOW WHY ID-MARK "JUDGE KOELTL" INFIXED ON DOC#l FIVE DAYS AFTER "FILING" SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED;
4) SHOW PROPRIETY OF PRECEEDING INDEX NYSD-CR-CASE-570's 96+ HOURS DOCKET SALTO FORWARD TO 6/18 OR CONFESS TO TRICKERY;
5) SHOW "CLERK LOPEZ" WAS A LIVING CLERK "MHO" FOLLOWED JUDICIAL ORDER ON 6/15 BY RUBBERSTAMPING WARRANTS
Just in Case this Court requires assistance identifying a real SEAL ORDER, here is one recent (Hon Peck) model in US vs Prado (13 Mag 2201):
Image materials not available for display.
Great news for proctor Harris' cheer: "let's be on the same page"!
The Court was noticed by "GOTCHA" fax http://bit.ly/1f3zQ54 that rectitude of a "06/14/2001" TRUE BILL filing was dismal, as in FRAUD UPON THE COURT.
Willful blindness by any Court adds to severe gravamen that must be remedied. In this instant case favorably to defendants and unfavorably to the government and Courts. Such claims arise often from continuing misconduct by Courts who seeks to shield their most frequent bulk-complainants, often former colleagues, from getting caught gaming the "system", which, according to reasonable jurists, is not uncommon or an unfettered occurrence aggravating heavy rigged odds against American citizenry, heavier stacked against terrestrial aliens, and pro se parties and are nothing less than bad faith attempts to cynically subvert the system, failing their public, once again.
In Aqurs, 427 U.S. at 110, the Supreme Court pointed to ERROR "because of the character of the evidence, not the character of the prosecutor". It is useless to deny gravity while falling, Movant suggests that this Court gauges whether "harm" inflicted upon American Society by plaintiff's conduct trumps that by defendant's alleged disrespect for domestic interstate carrier mailing on 06/28/1996 to Germany, far away from the protected homeland as proscribed by §1341. [Who was Ibsen's real "Enemy of the state"?]
All counts evaporated post-trial on absurdity and on facts, due, in part, to the government's entire maldependence upon "CRIMINAL DOMESTIC MAIL FRAUD" theory in a "Foreign Commerce Scenario", unsupported by their USManual, statutory and case law.
--------
And, this Court shall probe whether the District Court abusively certified deceptive entries for the Second Circuit, seriatim, for multiple Appeals conducted on a corrupted set of entries,
IGNORANTIA IURIS NOCET
Therefore, this MOTION should be granted in its entirety, TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE since risk of additional records tampering by plaintiff's agents remains substantial: [d]ishonest conduct or unwarranted concealment should attract no judicial approbation." ( Banks v. Dretke , 540 U.S. 668, 124 S.Ct. 1256, 157 L.Ed.2d 1166 (2084) (citations omitted). Respectfully submitted this 30th day of January, 2014
Christian T Viertel, Movant pro se
9/18 v. delle Ballodole Firenze, ITALIA 58139
N/A Tel +1 360 227 6326 , viertel2005@aol.com
PS: United States Attorney Lynch found proper words on Tuesday:"Abusing his position as an attorney [by laundering money], [Scaglione] not only violated the code of ethics by which he was bound - he also broke the law. Those attorneys who seek to misuse the trust that is instilled in them by the public to perpetrate crime are on notice that they will be held accountable for their crimes". NYED: 1 NYSD: 0
1 Page APPENDICES A & B
Certification of Service
by EMAIL: upon USANYS Mr.Preetinder Bharara on this day.
Hard copy by USPS to NYSD pro se clerk for transmission to criminal division and to
Chief Judge NYSD, Hon. Loretta A. Preska
Courtesy Hard Copy for Information:
Hon. Associate Justice SCQTUS, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, doyenne Second Circuit
Hon. John D. Bates, Director AOUSC, in lieu of a badly needed OIG
Appendix A: Photo taken from USA-33 Form.
Image materials not available for display. Appendix B: "Enclosure" FBI FAX 06/15/01. Reception 06/19/01 FLSD_WPB
Image materials not available for display.