From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Video Voice, Inc. v. Local T.V., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2014
114 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-26

VIDEO VOICE, INC., respondent, v. LOCAL T.V., INC., appellant.

Esseks, Hefter & Angel, LLP, Riverhead, N.Y. (Theodore D. Sklar of counsel), for appellant. Roy A. McKenzie, New York, N.Y., for respondent.


Esseks, Hefter & Angel, LLP, Riverhead, N.Y. (Theodore D. Sklar of counsel), for appellant. Roy A. McKenzie, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the parties' rights and obligations under a lease and to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated August 22, 2012, which, in effect, denied, as premature, its motion for summary judgment, among other things, dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“A party should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to conduct discovery prior to the determination of a motion for summary judgment” ( Amico v. Melville Volunteer Fire Co., Inc., 39 A.D.3d 784, 785, 832 N.Y.S.2d 813). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, as premature, the defendant's motion for summary judgment ( see CPLR 3212[f]; Bank of America, N.A. v. Hillside Cycles, Inc., 89 A.D.3d 653, 654, 932 N.Y.S.2d 128;Silver v. Silver, 63 A.D.3d 903, 880 N.Y.S.2d 544;Elliot v. County of Nassau, 53 A.D.3d 561, 563, 862 N.Y.S.2d 90;Venables v. Sagona, 46 A.D.3d 672, 673, 848 N.Y.S.2d 238). RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Video Voice, Inc. v. Local T.V., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2014
114 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Video Voice, Inc. v. Local T.V., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VIDEO VOICE, INC., respondent, v. LOCAL T.V., INC., appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 26, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
114 A.D.3d 935
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1316

Citing Cases

Martinez v. 305 W. 52 Condo.

“A party should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to conduct discovery prior to the determination of a…

Torres v. Mejia

" Chmelovsky v. Country Club Homes, Inc., 106 A.D.3d 684, 964 N.Y.S.2d 245, 246 [2d Dept 2013]; Martinez v.…