From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vidal v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2001
289 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

89589

December 13, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Joseph Vidal, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit violent conduct, fighting, assaulting an inmate and possession of a weapon. The correction officer who had witnessed the incident in question testified that he had observed petitioner striking another inmate with a broom handle. The second inmate then knocked petitioner down and slashed his face with an unknown weapon. Both inmates ignored orders to stop fighting, compelling correction officers to intervene.

We find that the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of petitioner were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of the charged misconduct (see, Matter of Kelly v. Goord, 251 A.D.2d 803; Matter of Wilkinson v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 834). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertion that the aid rendered to him by his employee assistant was inadequate, have been examined and found to be without merit.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Vidal v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2001
289 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Vidal v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH VIDAL, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 13, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 328

Citing Cases

Gallo v. Annucci

We confirm. The misbehavior report and hearing testimony from the author of that report, together with the…

Tenace v. Lombard

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with petitioner's own testimony, in which he admitted to taking…