From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vick v. Whitfield

Superior Court of North Carolina Halifax
Oct 1, 1802
3 N.C. 222 (N.C. Super. 1802)

Opinion

(October Term, 1802.)

In an action of slander, the defendant may, under the pleas of the general issue and justification, prove the defendant's character to be a bad one in mitigation of damages, but shall not be allowed to prove any particular act.

THIS was an action for words; and the defendant pleaded the general issue and justification.


The defendant may give in evidence that the plaintiff's character is a bad one, in mitigation of damages; but he shall not be allowed to prove any particular act.

Evidence of reputation was given accordingly, and the jury found for the plaintiff, but gave only sixpence damages, owing, as I suppose, to the evidence aforesaid.

NOTE. — See Nelson v. Evans, 12 N.C. 9.

Cited: Goodbread v. Ledbetter, 18 N.C. 13.


Summaries of

Vick v. Whitfield

Superior Court of North Carolina Halifax
Oct 1, 1802
3 N.C. 222 (N.C. Super. 1802)
Case details for

Vick v. Whitfield

Case Details

Full title:VICK v. WHITFIELD

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina Halifax

Date published: Oct 1, 1802

Citations

3 N.C. 222 (N.C. Super. 1802)