From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vicente v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 13, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-13

In the Matter of Juan VICENTE, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Respondent.

Juan Vicente, Pine City, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Juan Vicente, Pine City, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, testimony at the hearing and confidential information provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit making threats and engaging in conduct involving the threat of violence ( see Matter of Hayward v. Fischer, 101 A.D.3d 1308, 1309, 955 N.Y.S.2d 460 [2012] ). The charges stemmed from an investigation into a letter identifying petitioner's plans to retaliate against a correction officer. A review of the record establishes that the Hearing Officer made a proper and sufficient inquiry of the correction officer who interviewed the confidential informant so as to independently assess the informant's reliability and credibility ( see Matter of Williams v. Fischer, 18 N.Y.3d 888, 890, 940 N.Y.S.2d 531, 963 N.E.2d 1232 [2012];Matter of Smythe v. Fischer, 102 A.D.3d 1039, 1040, 957 N.Y.S.2d 918 [2013] ). Petitioner's denial of the charges presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Ford v. Prack, 101 A.D.3d 1276, 1277, 955 N.Y.S.2d 459 [2012] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

PETERS, P.J., ROSE, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vicente v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 13, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Vicente v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Juan VICENTE, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 13, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
966 N.Y.S.2d 705
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4400

Citing Cases

Walker v. Fischer

We find this argument to be without merit. The Hearing Officer's in-depth in camera interview with the…

Gomez v. Venettozzi

Contrary to petitioner's contention, the Hearing Officer made an independent assessment of the reliability of…