From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vicari v. Shea

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2023
215 A.D.3d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

53 Index No. 161001/20 Case No. 2021–03892

04-18-2023

In the Matter of Frank VICARI, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Dermot SHEA etc., et al., Respondents–Appellants.

Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip W. Young of counsel), for appellants. The Bellantoni Law Firm, PLLC, Scarsdale (Amy L. Bellantoni of counsel), for respondent.


Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip W. Young of counsel), for appellants.

The Bellantoni Law Firm, PLLC, Scarsdale (Amy L. Bellantoni of counsel), for respondent.

Webber, J.P., Friedman, Singh, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ.

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered June 9, 2021, granting the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondents New York City Police Department (N.Y.PD) officials, dated August 18, 2020, which denied petitioner's administrative appeal of the denial of his special carry handgun license application, and remanded to NYPD for further consideration of petitioner's application, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the order vacated and the matter remanded to NYPD to reconsider petitioner's application under recent legislative and regulatory amendments.

The article 78 court remanded petitioner's application for a special carry handgun license which NYPD denied under the then-governing proper-cause standard of 38 RCNY 5–03 and Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f) prior to their amendment. However, following the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ––––, 142 S.Ct. 2111, 213 L.Ed.2d 387 (2022), which invalidated the proper-cause requirement under the Second Amendment, the legislature amended the Penal Law and NYPD amended its regulations to eliminate that standard (see Penal Law § 400.00 ; 38 RCNY 5–03). We therefore vacate the court's order and remand to respondents to reconsider petitioner's application under the now-governing standards (see Matter of Callahan v. City of New York, 208 A.D.3d 422, 423, 173 N.Y.S.3d 243 [1st Dept. 2022] ).


Summaries of

Vicari v. Shea

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2023
215 A.D.3d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Vicari v. Shea

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Frank VICARI, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Dermot SHEA etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 18, 2023

Citations

215 A.D.3d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
186 N.Y.S.3d 207

Citing Cases

Ward v. The New York Police Dep't. Headquarters License Div.

Respondent's denial of petitioner's application for a handgun license was not arbitrary and capricious (see…

Sanicola v. The City of New York

We agree with petitioner that his failure to demonstrate proper cause may no longer serve as an appropriate…