Opinion
Civil Case No. 06-cv-00812-LTB-MEH.
November 22, 2006
ORDER
This case is before me on the recommendation of the magistrate judge that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), or, in the Alternative, Motion For More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e) [Filed June 29, 2006: docket #10] be granted with regard to Plaintiff's request that certain filings be stricken and denied as moot with regard to Plaintiff's request for a more definite statement; 2. Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Strike the Filings of Defendant Ralph Suddath [Filed August 30, 2006; docket #22] be granted; 3. that the court strike in their entirety the filings made by Defendant Suddath as set forth in Dockets #2, #19 and #20; and 4. that the court strike, in its entirety, the filing made by Alvin Joseph Hansen as set forth in Docket #9.
The recommendations were entered and served on September 18, 2006. Defendants have filed no written objections to the magistrate judge's recommendations and therefore are barred from de novo review. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), Docket No. 10, is GRANTED and the Motion in The Alternative For More Definite Statement, Docket No. 10, is DENIED AS MOOT; 2. Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Strike the Filings of Defendant Ralph Suddath, Docket No. 22, is GRANTED; 3. filings by Defendant Suddath, Docket Nos. 2, 19 and 20 are STRICKEN IN THEIR ENTIRETY; and 4. the filing made by Alvin Joseph Hansen, Docket No. 9, is STRICKEN IN ITS ENTIRETY.