From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vest v. Pennington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 20, 2013
Case No.: 4:11-cv-364-KGB (E.D. Ark. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 4:11-cv-364-KGB

02-20-2013

SCOTT VEST, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated PLAINTIFF v. RAY PENNINGTON, individually and in his official capacity; and DAN MCDONALD in his official capacity DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Plaintiff Scott Vest brings this claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act against Ray Pennington, individually and in his official capacity, and Dan McDonald in his official capacity. Mr. McDonald moved for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 50). Mr. Vest responded by requesting an order abandoning his claim against Mr. McDonald (Dkt. No. 60). In his response, Mr. Vest moves to dismiss with prejudice his claim against Mr. McDonald.

Mr. McDonald's motion for summary judgment is conceded by Mr. Vest and granted (Dkt. No. 50). Mr. Vest's claims against Mr. McDonald are dismissed with prejudice.

______________________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vest v. Pennington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 20, 2013
Case No.: 4:11-cv-364-KGB (E.D. Ark. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Vest v. Pennington

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT VEST, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 4:11-cv-364-KGB (E.D. Ark. Feb. 20, 2013)