From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verret Construction Co. v. Jelco Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 28, 1977
572 P.2d 1029 (Or. 1977)

Opinion

No. 36-355, SC 25120

Argued November 8, 1977

Affirmed December 28, 1977

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County.

Albert R. Musick, Judge.

Affirmed.

DeMar L. Batchelor, of Schwenn, Bradley Batchelor, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Thomas A. Huffman, of Huffman Zenger, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before Holman, Presiding Justice, Howell and Lent, Justices, and Gillette, Justice Pro Tempore.


PER CURIAM.


Plaintiff brought an action to recover the reasonable value of the use of some heavy construction equipment. Defendant appealed from a judgment based upon a jury verdict for plaintiff. Defendant's only assignment of error is that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury verdict.

Defendant made no motion for a non-suit or for a directed verdict. In the absence of having tested the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict in the trial court, defendant cannot raise the issue on appeal. Wood Ind'l Corp. v. Rose, 271 Or. 103, 105-06, 530 P.2d 1245 (1975); Shmit v. Day, 27 Or. 110, 116-17, 39 P. 870 (1895).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Verret Construction Co. v. Jelco Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 28, 1977
572 P.2d 1029 (Or. 1977)
Case details for

Verret Construction Co. v. Jelco Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VERRET CONSTRUCTION CO., Respondent, v. JELCO INCORPORATED, Appellant

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 28, 1977

Citations

572 P.2d 1029 (Or. 1977)
572 P.2d 1029

Citing Cases

Falk v. Amsberry

We noted the value of requiring such a motion but did not impose it on the facts of that case: "We might well…

Millard v. Smedes

At trial there was also a contract claim and counterclaim which are not at issue here. Defendant asserts…