From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vernick v. Bennett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 4, 1990
558 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-0161.

April 4, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Richard L. Oftedal, Judge.

Edward A. Perse of Horton, Perse Ginsberg, and Carroll Halberg, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Vernis Bowling, P.A., Jupiter, and Richard H.W. Maloy, Key Biscayne, for appellees.


Reversed upon authority of Queen v. Clearwater Electric, Inc., 555 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), and remanded for further proceedings.

We certify the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:

DO SECTIONS 95.11(5)(d) AND 631.68, FLORIDA STATUTES (1983), CONSTITUTE A BAR TO A SUIT ON A TORT CLAIM AGAINST AN INSURED ARISING OUT OF AN AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT AS TO ANY AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE APPLICABLE LIMITS OF AN INSURANCE POLICY ISSUED BY AN INSOLVENT INSURER WHEN SUIT AGAINST THE INSURED IS COMMENCED MORE THAN ONE YEAR AFTER THE DEADLINE FOR FILING CLAIMS, OR ANY EXTENSION THEREOF, WITH THE RECEIVER OF THE INSOLVENT INSURER?

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vernick v. Bennett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 4, 1990
558 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Vernick v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN VERNICK AND FLORENCE VERNICK, WIFE, DERIVATIVE CLAIMANT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 4, 1990

Citations

558 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Rubenstein v. Pastor Saldariagga

However, these statutes do not restrict her claim for damages against the original insured above $10,000. See…