From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vernazza v. Securities Exchange Commission

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 24, 2003
335 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Nos. 01-71857, 02-70016, 3-9042.

Argued and Submitted February 5, 2003.

Filed April 24, 2003. Amended July 17, 2003.

Sheldon M. Jaffe, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner Jerome B. Vernazza.

Thomas D. Giachetti, Princeton, NJ, and Ashleigh C. Swayze, Stark Stark, PC, Lawrenceville, NJ, for petitioners IMS/CPAs Associates, Vernon T. Hall, and Stanley E. Hargrave.

Eric Summergrad, Deputy Solicitor, and Mark Pennington, Assistant General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for the respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Securities Exchange Commission.

Before D.W. NELSON, WARDLAW and FISHER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The respondent's motion to amend the opinion is DENIED. The opinion filed April 24, 2003, is amended as follows:

Slip op. at 5318, line 13: Replace the phrase "Although the Commission's determination of the duty of care" with "Although the Commission's application of the duty of care to the facts of this case"

The time for filing a petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc has expired. No petitions for rehearing shall be allowed on the basis of this amendment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vernazza v. Securities Exchange Commission

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 24, 2003
335 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Vernazza v. Securities Exchange Commission

Case Details

Full title:Jerome B. VERNAZZA, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 24, 2003

Citations

335 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2003)

Citing Cases

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Sisu Capital, LLC

“[S]cienter is a required element for violations of . . . Advisers Act § 206(1)” but it “is not required for”…

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Choice Advisors, LLC

Vernazza v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 327 F.3d 851, 859 (9th Cir. 2003), as amended, 335 F.3d 1096 (9th…