From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verille v. Kopic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 2003
304 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-08387

Submitted April 2, 2003.

April 28, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated August 9, 2002, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4) to vacate a judgment of the same court (Kellman, J.H.O.), dated May 26, 1999, and entered upon his failure to appear or answer the complaint.

Richard W. Fulfree, Yonkers, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing on the issue of whether proper service was effected.

Ordinarily a proper affidavit of a process server attesting to personal delivery of a summons to a party is sufficient to support a finding of jurisdiction. Where, as here, however, there is a sworn denial of service by the party allegedly served, the affidavit of service is rebutted and jurisdiction must be established by a preponderance of the evidence at a hearing (see Griffin v. Griffin, 215 A.D.2d 386; Skyline Agency v. Coppotelli, Inc., 117 A.D.2d 135). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the motion to vacate the defendant's default without conducting a hearing on the issue of whether proper service was effected (see Griffin v. Griffin, supra).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Verille v. Kopic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 2003
304 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Verille v. Kopic

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN VERILLE, ET AL., respondents, v. DRAGO KOPIC, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 28, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 875

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Peralta

Peralta appeals, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing to determine the validity of service of process.…

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Peralta

Peralta appeals, arguing that she was entitled to a hearing to determine the validity of service of process.…