From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verduce v. Board of Higher Education

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1960
168 N.E.2d 838 (N.Y. 1960)

Opinion

Argued May 23, 1960

Decided June 10, 1960

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HAROLD A. STEVENS, J.

Benjamin H. Siff and Lester Lewis Jay for appellants.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel ( Alfred Weinstein, Seymour B. Quel and Stanley Katz of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. On the particular facts of this case, and for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division, issues of fact were presented which should have been submitted to a jury. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and FOSTER. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.


Summaries of

Verduce v. Board of Higher Education

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1960
168 N.E.2d 838 (N.Y. 1960)
Case details for

Verduce v. Board of Higher Education

Case Details

Full title:ROSALIE A. VERDUCE et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 10, 1960

Citations

168 N.E.2d 838 (N.Y. 1960)
168 N.E.2d 838
204 N.Y.S.2d 168

Citing Cases

Yarborough v. City University of New York

(Tabone v State of New York, 116 Misc.2d 864; Segal v State of New York, 79 Misc.2d 529.) This responsibility…

Benitez v. New York City Board of Education

The evidence here indicates that defendants unreasonably enhanced or increased the risk of plaintiff being…