From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ventrone v. Tarancki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 15, 1969
32 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

May 15, 1969

Appeal from the Onondaga Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Marsh, Witmer, Bastow and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The alleged tortious act upon which plaintiff bases his cause of action was independent of and not related to the common employment of the parties to the action. The fact that the act occurred upon the employer's premises (cf. Doyle v. Jennings, 31 A.D.2d 608) is not controlling because of the intervention of the over-riding and independent alleged wrongful conduct of defendants which had no relationship to common employment (cf. Matter of Marks v. Freeman Bus Corp., 28 A.D.2d 751).


Summaries of

Ventrone v. Tarancki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 15, 1969
32 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Ventrone v. Tarancki

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY VENTRONE, Respondent, v. EDWARD P. TARANCKI et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 15, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
302 N.Y.S.2d 108

Citing Cases

Maines v. Cronomer Valley Fire Dept., Inc.

available only if the complaint alleges commission of a willful or intentional act, they are distinguishable…

Knowlton v. Tranter, Inc.

Although the actual injury occurred on the employer's premises in the course of employment, we find the…