From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velazquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 5, 1999
727 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-3335

Opinion filed March 5, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Jay Paul Cohen, Judge.

Julian Max Velazquez, Jasper, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Julian Max Velazquez appeals an order denying rehearing of an order which summarily granted in part and dismissed in part his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The motion for rehearing did not address the partial dismissal of the 3.850 motion. Rather, Velazquez raised sentencing issues concerning a separate but related case which were not raised previously. This appeal, in effect, seeks review of issues never considered by the trial court. As such, the issues are not ripe for review. See Williams v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA April 24, 1998); Young v. State, 695 So.2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice to Velazquez to file a proper motion under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), see Glanton v. State, 705 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (miscalculations apparent on face of scoresheet are reviewable on a rule 3.800(a) motion), or 3.850, see State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1995) (3.850 motion necessary if evidentiary hearing is required).

DISMISSED.

HARRIS, J., concurs.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Velazquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 5, 1999
727 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Velazquez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN MAX VELAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 5, 1999

Citations

727 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)