From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velasquez v. Gipson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 8, 2013
No. SA CV 12-1078-JSL (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. SA CV 12-1078-JSL (PLA)

07-08-2013

MAURICIO VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice.

____________________

HONORABLE J. SPENCER LETTS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Velasquez v. Gipson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 8, 2013
No. SA CV 12-1078-JSL (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Velasquez v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:MAURICIO VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 8, 2013

Citations

No. SA CV 12-1078-JSL (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Petrick v. Thornton

Further, a summary judgment response (or traverse) "is not the proper place to raise new facts. Under Rule…

France v. Perry

However, a summary judgment response "is not the proper place to raise new facts. Under Rule 2(c) of the…