From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vega v. Bezio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-18

In the Matter of Israel VEGA, Petitioner, v. Norman BEZIO, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Israel Vega, Ogdensburg, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.



Israel Vega, Ogdensburg, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, STEIN and GARRY, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. The determination was upheld upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and related documentation and the hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Neil v. Fischer, 89 A.D.3d 1308, 1309, 932 N.Y.S.2d 740 [2011], lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 807, 2012 WL 490143 [2012] ). Contrary to petitioner's arguments, that evidence amply established the chain of custody of the specimen and laid a foundation to permit consideration of the positive test results ( see7 NYCRR 1020.4, 1020.5; Matter of Neil v. Fischer, 89 A.D.3d at 1309, 932 N.Y.S.2d 740;Matter of Rowe v. Goord, 289 A.D.2d 764, 765, 734 N.Y.S.2d 329 [2001] ). His remaining contentions have been considered and, to the extent they are properly before us, rejected.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Vega v. Bezio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Vega v. Bezio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Israel VEGA, Petitioner, v. Norman BEZIO, as Director of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2623
962 N.Y.S.2d 820