From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veccia v. Clearmeadow Pistol Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 2002
300 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2002-03341

Argued November 15, 2002.

December 16, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated March 21, 2002, as denied the motion of the defendants Clearmeadow Pistol Club, Ltd. and Clearmeadow Rifle and Pistol Club, Inc., and the separate motion of the defendant Panrad Automotive Industries, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, LLP (Fiedelman McGaw, Jericho, N.Y. [Andrew Zajac] of counsel), for appellants Clearmeadow Pistol Club, Ltd. and Clearmeadow Rifle and Pistol Club, Inc.

Turner Owen, New York, N.Y. (Sherman B. Kerner of counsel), for appellant Panrad Automotive Industries, Inc.

Burger Perotta (Marvin Ben-Aron, Staten Island, N.Y., of counsel), for respondents.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motions are granted, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety.

In opposition to the appellants' prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Joseph Veccia were caused by a structural defect in the stair on which he may have slipped (see Speirs v. Dick's Clothing and Sporting Goods, 268 A.D.2d 581). The affidavit of the plaintiffs' expert did not sufficiently identify any specific industry standard upon which he relied in regard to the stairs, nor did he supply any specific statutory or building code violations (see Cicero v. Selden Assocs., 295 A.D.2d 391, 392; Speirs v. Dick's Clothing and Sporting Goods, supra). Thus, the expert's affidavit was insufficient to defeat the appellants' respective motions for summary judgment (see Romano v. Stanley, 90 N.Y.2d 444; Murphy v. Conner, 84 N.Y.2d 969).

S. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Veccia v. Clearmeadow Pistol Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 2002
300 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Veccia v. Clearmeadow Pistol Club

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH VECCIA, ET AL., respondents, v. CLEARMEADOW PISTOL CLUB, LTD.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
752 N.Y.S.2d 84

Citing Cases

Bohan v. F.R.P. Sheet Metal Contr. Corp.

The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the expert affidavit submitted by the plaintiff's failed to raise…

Beadell v. Eros Mgt. Reality

Specifically, Dr. McGowan opined that failing to contact the police after decedent's sister's first call was…