From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veal v. Kuplesky

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 22, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-00566 (W.D. La. Mar. 22, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-00566

03-22-2016

JAMES VEAL v. STEPHEN KUPLESKY, et al.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Veal's complaint against Nurse Gaskill, Nurse Mary, and Nurse Warren is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 4(m).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 75) is GRANTED and Veal's action against Amy Brunson, Daniel Marr, Stephen Kuplesky, Nicole Walker, Barbara Spence, and Corrections Corporation of America is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in Chambers at Alexandria, Louisiana on this 22nd day of March 2016.

/s/_________

JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Veal v. Kuplesky

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 22, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-00566 (W.D. La. Mar. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Veal v. Kuplesky

Case Details

Full title:JAMES VEAL v. STEPHEN KUPLESKY, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-00566 (W.D. La. Mar. 22, 2016)