From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VEAL v. JONES

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 12, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-350-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-350-F.

February 12, 2009


ORDER


On December 22, 2008, United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein he recommended that the court grant respondent's motion to dismiss and dismiss petitioner's habeas corpus petition on the grounds of mootness.

Presently before the court is petitioner's objection to the Report and Recommendation. The court has conducted a de novo review of the matter in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Having done so, the court concurs with the analysis and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bacharach. The court finds petitioner's objections to be without merit. Therefore, the court accepts, adopts, and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach on December 22, 2008 (doc. no. 32) is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss as Moot, filed September 30, 2008 (doc. no. 26), is GRANTED. Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED on the grounds of mootness.


Summaries of

VEAL v. JONES

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 12, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-350-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 12, 2009)
Case details for

VEAL v. JONES

Case Details

Full title:RONALD R. VEAL, Petitioner, v. JUSTIN JONES, Director of the Oklahoma…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 12, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-350-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ezell v. Crow

“A habeas corpus petition is moot when ‘it no longer present[s] a case or controversy under Article III, § 2,…

Daniels v. Swarthout

Accordingly, this action has been rendered moot and federal habeas relief in response to the pending petition…