From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vazquez v. State of New York

Court of Claims
Feb 10, 2009
23 Misc. 3d 1101 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2009)

Summary

In Vazquez v State of New York (23 Misc 3d 1101[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50527[U] [Ct Cl 2009]) and Nazario v State of New York (24 Misc 3d 443 [Ct Cl 2009]), DOCS' interpretation of Penal Law § 70.45 as mandating PRS in certain cases and its decision to administratively apply PRS to those individuals was held to be a "quasi-judicial function for which DOCS is entitled to absolute immunity" (2009 NY Slip Op 50527[U], *9; 24 Misc 3d at 459).

Summary of this case from Mickens v. State of N.Y

Opinion

February 10, 2009.


State Claim against State — Permission to File Late Claim — Claim for false imprisonment relating to period of confinement for violating conditions of improperly imposed term of postrelease supervision was meritless. Court of Claims Act — § 10 (6) (Time of filing claims and notices of intention to file claims; permission to file late claim).


Summaries of

Vazquez v. State of New York

Court of Claims
Feb 10, 2009
23 Misc. 3d 1101 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2009)

In Vazquez v State of New York (23 Misc 3d 1101[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50527[U] [Ct Cl 2009]) and Nazario v State of New York (24 Misc 3d 443 [Ct Cl 2009]), DOCS' interpretation of Penal Law § 70.45 as mandating PRS in certain cases and its decision to administratively apply PRS to those individuals was held to be a "quasi-judicial function for which DOCS is entitled to absolute immunity" (2009 NY Slip Op 50527[U], *9; 24 Misc 3d at 459).

Summary of this case from Mickens v. State of N.Y
Case details for

Vazquez v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:Vazquez v. State of New York

Court:Court of Claims

Date published: Feb 10, 2009

Citations

23 Misc. 3d 1101 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 50527

Citing Cases

Mickens v. State of N.Y

When provided with sufficient factual information on which to base a conclusion, the Judges of this court…

White v. State

In Matter of Kairis v State of New York (113 AD3d 942 [3d Dept 2014]), the court held that: "The applicable…