From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vazquez v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 2002
291 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

5546

February 7, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered on or about August 29, 2000, which granted defendants-respondents' motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motions denied and the complaint reinstated as against them.

ANTHONY J. VISONE, for plaintiff-appellant.

MAX W. GERSHWEIR PATRICK J. FOGARTY, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach, Marlow, JJ.


Since the deposition testimony of plaintiff and two non-party witnesses raises issues of fact as to whether either or both of defendants-respondents created the condition that allegedly caused plaintiff to slip and fall, i.e., a patch of ice and grease on the sidewalk outside the restaurant, defendants' motions for summary judgment were improperly granted (see, Ramos v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 269 A.D.2d 220).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Vazquez v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 2002
291 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Vazquez v. Santana

Case Details

Full title:JOSE VAZQUEZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARGARITA SANTANA, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 90

Citing Cases

Lee v. King

Defendants did not demonstrate their entitlement to summary judgment, since their conflicting evidence failed…

Klein v. Sujin Food Corp.

Plaintiff failed to raise a question of fact as to whether the greasy substance on which he allegedly slipped…