From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Marques

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 13, 2019
Civil No. 18-1266(JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jun. 13, 2019)

Opinion

Civil No. 18-1266(JRT/HB)

06-13-2019

MELVIN VAUGHN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN R. MARQUES, Respondent.

Melvin Vaughn, #23991-047, Federal Prison Camp, P.O. Box 8000, Bradford, PA 16701, pro se petitioner. Erin M Secord, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for respondent.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Melvin Vaughn, #23991-047, Federal Prison Camp, P.O. Box 8000, Bradford, PA 16701, pro se petitioner. Erin M Secord, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for respondent.

United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer filed a Report and Recommendation on May 15, 2019. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2. Petitioner Melvin Vaughn's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Doc. No. 1, is DENIED; and

3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: June 13, 2019
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/John R. Tunheim

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Marques

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 13, 2019
Civil No. 18-1266(JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jun. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Marques

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN VAUGHN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN R. MARQUES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 13, 2019

Citations

Civil No. 18-1266(JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jun. 13, 2019)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Bureau of Prisons

It is important to note that there are exceptions to the general rule that this Court lacks jurisdiction over…