From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 30, 2022
1:21CV1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2022)

Opinion

1:21CV1

03-30-2022

MICHELLE NICHOLE VAUGHN, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

THOMAS D. SCHROEDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on March 1, 2022, was served on the parties in this action. (Docs. 15, 16.) Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 17.)

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Doc. 10) is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 12) is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 30, 2022
1:21CV1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE NICHOLE VAUGHN, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 30, 2022

Citations

1:21CV1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2022)