From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Cunningham

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

03-10-2016

In the Matter of Dwight VAUGHN, Petitioner, v. Robert F. CUNNINGHAM, as Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Dwight Vaughn, Woodbourne, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Dwight Vaughn, Woodbourne, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of making false statements and interfering with an employee. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter has been rendered moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Jackson v. Prack, 131 A.D.3d 1321, 1321, 16 N.Y.S.3d 480 [2015] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

GARRY, J.P., EGAN JR., ROSE and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Cunningham

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Dwight VAUGHN, Petitioner, v. Robert F. CUNNINGHAM, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 10, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1719
26 N.Y.S.3d 487

Citing Cases

Zane v. Iafallo

Dr. Suddaby's affirmation report and Plaintiff s deposition testimony create questions Of fact as to whether…

Elmore v. Panek

injuries, triable issues of fact for resolution by a jury are created (Cook v. Peterson. 137 A.D.3d 1394…