From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 15, 2011
412 F. App'x 559 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-1542.

Submitted: January 28, 2011.

Decided: February 15, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. David W. Daniel, Magistrate Judge. (2:0-cv-00028-DAN).

Amos Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mary Ellen Russell, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Amos Vaughn appeals the magistrate judge's order granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v. Astrue, No. 2:09-cv-00028-DAN (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2010). We deny the motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 15, 2011
412 F. App'x 559 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Amos VAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 15, 2011

Citations

412 F. App'x 559 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Gari G. v. O'Malley

I deny Gari's request for oral argument, Pl.'s Br. 3, ECF No. 8, because the facts and legal contentions are…