From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vassilakos v. Vassilakos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 27, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, Rigler, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, the imposition of sanctions of $3,500 against defendant's attorney as a condition of relieving defendant from his default is warranted and is an appropriate exercise of Supreme Court's discretion (see, Folk v. State of New York, 185 A.D.2d 267, 268; Sasson v. Sasson, 134 A.D.2d 491, 492; Gabrelian v. Gabrelian, 108 A.D.2d 445, 447-448, appeal dismissed 66 N.Y.2d 741). The challenge to the propriety of the order striking defendant's answer is not properly before us because defendant did not appeal from that order (see, CPLR 5515; see also, Hecht v. City of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 57, 61).


Summaries of

Vassilakos v. Vassilakos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Vassilakos v. Vassilakos

Case Details

Full title:ANA VASSILAKOS, Respondent, v. PETER VASSILAKOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 947

Citing Cases

Mura v. Mura

We further conclude that the court properly denied plaintiff's cross motion for disgorgement of funds paid to…