From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vass v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 14, 2021
No. A22A0520 (Ga. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2021)

Opinion

A22A0520

12-14-2021

CHRISTOPHER VASS v. THE STATE.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

Christopher Vass was convicted of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. We affirmed his convictions on appeal. Vass v. State, 347 Ga.App. 535 (820 S.E.2d 181) (2018). Vass later filed several pro se motions seeking the production of trial transcripts and other records in his case, including reports from police investigators. On July 14, 2021, the trial court entered an order denying these motions, and on September 1, 2021, Vass filed a notice of appeal to this Court. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely.

Assuming, without deciding, that Vass had a right of direct appeal here, the appeal is untimely. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the order on appeal. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Davis v. State, 330 Ga.App. 711, 711 (769 S.E.2d 133) (2015). Here, Vass's notice of appeal was filed 49 days after entry of the trial court's order.

"After the time for appeal has expired there is no due process or equal protection right to a free copy of one's court records absent a showing of necessity or justification." Schoicket v. State, 304 Ga. 255, 255 (818 S.E.2d 561) (2018) (punctuation omitted) (dismissing appeal from denial of motion for free records where defendant made no showing of necessity or justification). In one of his motions, Vass asserted that he has a "current active habeas corpus trial . . . in the Superior Court of Baldwin County," but he did not attach a copy of the habeas petition.

The notice is dated July 28, 2021-well before the expiration of Vass's 30-day appeal period-but was not stamped "filed" by the trial court clerk until September 1. We recognize that, as a pro se prisoner, Vass is dependent upon correctional personnel to dispatch his mail. Nevertheless, even though Vass may have acted promptly after receiving the trial court's order, "his filing did not get to the superior court in time. So we have no jurisdiction over his appeal." Ebeling v. State, 355 Ga.App. 469, 470 (844 S.E.2d 518) (2020).

Accordingly, the State's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Vass v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 14, 2021
No. A22A0520 (Ga. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Vass v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER VASS v. THE STATE.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

No. A22A0520 (Ga. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2021)