Summary
In Vasquez v. Panama R.R. Co. (208 App. Div. 740; affd., 239 N.Y. 590) the question was not presented to the court for decision because in his brief the plaintiff there conceded that the allowance of interest on the verdict was error; and in Bezue v. N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co. (232 App. Div. 840) interest was allowed at the Trial Term, and on the appeal the defendant abandoned that question.
Summary of this case from Murmann v. New York, New Haven H.R.R. Co.Opinion
January, 1924.
Present — Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Kapper, JJ.
Judgment modified by striking out the item of $717.50, being interest on the verdict, on authority of Lynott v. Great Lakes Transit Corporation ( 202 App. Div. 613, 621), and as so modified the judgment, and the order, are unanimously affirmed, without costs.