From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasiloff v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4: 10-CV-8001-VEH-MHH (N.D. Ala. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4: 10-CV-8001-VEH-MHH CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:07-CR-337-VEH-MHH

10-30-2012

GARY STEVEN VASILOFF, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER

On September 4, 2012, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the plaintiff was allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections have been filed by the plaintiff.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The Government's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) if DENIED and the Government has twenty-one (21) days in which to file any response addressing Vasiloff's § 2255 claims on the merits. This matter is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge.

__________________

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vasiloff v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4: 10-CV-8001-VEH-MHH (N.D. Ala. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Vasiloff v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GARY STEVEN VASILOFF, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4: 10-CV-8001-VEH-MHH (N.D. Ala. Oct. 30, 2012)

Citing Cases

Threatt v. United States

preclude these issues, which relate to the validity of the plea or waiver itself.Id. at 207 (citation…