From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Varvitsiotes v. Pierre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 27, 1999
260 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 27, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.).


Uncontested evidence of discovery noncompliance by defendant, including his repeated and unexplained failures to attend court ordered depositions, warranted the striking of his answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 ( see, Kutner v. Feiden, Dweck Sladkus, 223 A.D.2d 488, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 802).

Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.


Summaries of

Varvitsiotes v. Pierre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 27, 1999
260 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Varvitsiotes v. Pierre

Case Details

Full title:ORESTES VARVITSIOTES, Respondent, v. PAUL C. PIERRE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 52

Citing Cases

Shohat v. Suky

While a minor delay in providing responses would not be a ground for striking a pleading, the failure to…

Reidel v. Ryder TRS, Inc.

The burden then shifts to the nonmoving party to demonstrate a reasonable excuse ( Furniture Fantasy v.…