From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Varrone v. Dinaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 1994
209 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Summary

holding that summary judgment was appropriate where plaintiff, who fell on defendant's stairway, failed to submit any evidence that a dangerous condition existed

Summary of this case from Boyko v. Sam's Club-Members Only

Opinion

November 14, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs contend that the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment because triable issues of fact exist as to whether the stairway upon which the injured plaintiff fell was dangerous or defective, and whether the condition of the stairway was a proximate cause of the accident. We disagree. Although the question of whether a dangerous or defective condition exists "`depends on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case'" and is generally a question of fact for the jury (see, Guerrieri v Summa, 193 A.D.2d 647; Schectman v. Lappin, 161 A.D.2d 118), here the plaintiffs failed to submit any evidence that the stairway was structurally unsafe, or that a dangerous and defective condition existed upon it (see, Anilus v. Gail Realties, 206 A.D.2d 446). Significantly, while the plaintiffs alleged in their complaint and verified bill of particulars that the dangerous condition on the stairway consisted of the presence of "slippery substances" on the steps, the injured plaintiff did not recall seeing any foreign substance on the steps prior to his fall, and was unable to state what had caused him to slip. Moreover, the defendant's deposition testimony that carpet treads which might have partially covered the steps on the date of the accident were "worn", and that the varnish underneath these treads had "worn off", was insufficient, standing alone, to create an issue of fact as to the existence of a dangerous or defective condition. In this regard, we further note that contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, there is no evidence that the lighting in the stairway area was inadequate. O'Brien, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Varrone v. Dinaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 1994
209 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

holding that summary judgment was appropriate where plaintiff, who fell on defendant's stairway, failed to submit any evidence that a dangerous condition existed

Summary of this case from Boyko v. Sam's Club-Members Only

granting defendant's summary judgment motion where plaintiff alleged that the stairway on which he fell was dangerous and defective, but "was unable to state what had caused him to slip" on that stairway

Summary of this case from Keyes v. American Airlines, Inc.
Case details for

Varrone v. Dinaro

Case Details

Full title:PETER VARRONE et al., Appellants, v. LINDA DINARO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 79

Citing Cases

Trincere v. County of Suffolk

The majority finds that the caselaw "reflects a prevailing view" that differences in elevation of about one…

Smith v. Target Corp.

This is insufficient to raise an issue of fact requiring a trial of this action. See Varrone v. Dinaro, 209…